airtape
We tested the top remote recording platforms so you don't have to. Here is how they compare for audio quality, reliability, guest experience, and post-production workflow.
Podcast audiences have grown accustomed to studio-quality audio even when hosts and guests are recording from different locations. The bar has moved: listeners will tolerate a remote recording, but they will not tolerate bad audio.
The challenge is that most communication tools — Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams — are built for live conversations, not for producing publishable recordings. They compress audio, mix all participants into a single track, and degrade quality when the internet connection is unstable.
Dedicated remote podcast recording software solves this by recording each participant locally on their own device, keeping separate tracks, and preserving source quality even when the internet connection is imperfect.
Before comparing specific tools, it helps to establish what actually matters for a remote podcast workflow:
Local recording — Each participant records on their own device so internet drops do not ruin the source file. This is the single most important feature for reliable remote recording.
Separate tracks — Editors need isolated audio and video files for each participant. A single mixed-down recording is much harder to edit and produces lower quality results.
Guest experience — Guests should be able to join with a browser link, no account or software installation required. The simpler the guest flow, the more likely the recording session happens smoothly.
Post-production tools — Built-in noise removal, audio cleanup, and transcription save significant time in the editing workflow.
Reliability — The platform should handle dropped connections, browser crashes, and variable internet quality without losing recorded material.
Airtape is a browser-based remote recording studio that focuses on local source capture, separate tracks per participant, and a lean workflow that reduces friction for both hosts and guests.
Each participant records locally on their device using the MediaRecorder API, with recordings sliced into chunks, stored in IndexedDB, and uploaded sequentially. This means a brief internet dropout during the call does not damage the final source file.
Guests join with a single browser link — no account creation, no software download, no technical setup. This makes Airtape particularly well suited for interviewing non-technical guests like customers, executives, or subject matter experts.
After the session, hosts can download separate audio and video tracks for every participant. The platform also offers automated noise removal, background hum suppression, and instant transcription as part of its post-production pipeline.
Airtape is currently in public beta at no cost, which makes it an attractive option for podcasters who want professional-grade remote recording without a monthly commitment.
Best for: Podcasters who prioritize recording reliability, guest experience, and clean source files over feature breadth.
Riverside.fm is the most well-known dedicated remote recording platform. It offers local recording, separate tracks, and a range of production-oriented features including text-based editing, AI show notes, and clip creation.
Riverside records locally on each participant's device, similar to Airtape, and provides separate audio and video tracks after the session. The platform has a polished, professional interface with a broader feature surface.
However, that broader feature surface can feel heavier for hosts who just want to record a conversation and get clean files. The guest onboarding flow requires more steps, and some users report that the interface can feel cluttered during setup.
Riverside offers a free tier with limited recording time and paid plans starting at around $19 per month for the standard plan.
Best for: Production teams that need built-in editing, clip creation, and show notes alongside their recording workflow.
Zencastr started as a simple remote recording tool and has evolved into a broader podcast production platform with integrated editing, hosting, and distribution features.
Like Airtape and Riverside, Zencastr records locally on each participant's device and provides separate tracks. The platform has added video recording, soundboard support, and automated post-production over the years.
Some users report that Zencastr sessions can feel fragile — dropped connections occasionally affect recording outcomes, and the guest experience has more friction than browser-only alternatives. The platform has also moved toward a more complex pricing structure.
Zencastr offers a free tier with limited features, with paid plans starting at around $18 per month.
Best for: Podcasters who want an all-in-one platform that handles recording, editing, hosting, and distribution in a single tool.
Squadcast (now part of Spotify) offers reliable local recording with separate tracks and a straightforward interface. It was acquired by Spotify in 2021 and has seen limited active development since then.
The platform still works well for basic remote recording needs, but the lack of recent feature updates and uncertainty about its long-term roadmap have led many users to explore alternatives.
Squadcast offers a free tier with limited recording time, with paid plans starting at around $20 per month.
Best for: Existing users who need a stable recording tool and are not concerned about the platform's long-term direction.
Cleanfeed takes a different approach from the other tools on this list. It is browser-based with extremely low latency, making it feel closer to a live broadcast environment than a recording platform.
Cleanfeed does not record locally — instead, it records on the server side. This means the recording quality depends on the internet connection during the call, and a dropout can affect the final file.
Cleanfeed is popular among radio producers and broadcasters who need real-time audio quality and are less concerned about post-production flexibility. It offers a free tier and paid plans starting at around $15 per month.
Best for: Live broadcast workflows where ultra-low latency matters more than local recording reliability.
Airtape: Local recording, separate tracks, browser-based guest access, free during beta. Best for recording reliability and simplicity.
Riverside.fm: Local recording, separate tracks, production features. Best for teams that need built-in editing and clip creation.
Zencastr: Local recording, separate tracks, all-in-one platform. Best for podcasters who want hosting and distribution included.
Squadcast: Local recording, separate tracks, straightforward interface. Best for existing users who need a stable tool.
Cleanfeed: Server-side recording, ultra-low latency. Best for live broadcast workflows.
The right choice depends on your specific workflow priorities:
If recording reliability and guest experience are your top concerns, Airtape's local-first architecture and browser-based guest flow make it a strong choice, especially while it remains free during beta.
If you need a full production suite with editing, clip creation, and show notes, Riverside.fm offers the most polished all-in-one experience.
If you want a single platform for recording, hosting, and distribution, Zencastr provides the most integrated workflow.
If you are doing live broadcast-style recordings where latency matters more than post-production flexibility, Cleanfeed is purpose-built for that use case.
The best approach is to try the tools that match your priorities. Most platforms offer free tiers or trials, so you can evaluate the actual recording quality and workflow before committing.
Airtape is currently free during public beta and offers local recording, separate tracks, and browser-based guest access. Zencastr and Riverside also offer free tiers with limited recording time.
Zoom records a single mixed track that is compressed for meeting quality. Dedicated remote recording software like Airtape records each participant locally and provides separate high-quality tracks that are much better for editing and publishing.
Yes. Airtape and Cleanfeed are browser-based, so guests can join with a single link. Riverside and Zencastr also offer browser-based joining, though the setup process involves more steps.
With local-recording platforms like Airtape, Riverside, and Zencastr, each participant records on their own device. A brief internet dropout affects the live conversation but does not damage the locally recorded source file.
Airtape, Riverside, Zencastr, and Squadcast all provide separate audio and video tracks for each participant. Cleanfeed provides a single mixed recording.